Yesterday, the International Association of Business Communicators announced that it will take the leading role in helping to develop standards for the creation of the social media release (or SMR, as they're calling it).
Here are three key elements of an SMR, according to IABC (oh so many acronyms...):
- Elements of the release, such as news, quotes, boilerplates and
contact information, are separated into sections, with core news facts
presented in concise paragraphs or listed in bullet format, making it
easy to identify the news and copy-and-paste pieces of the release into
an online article or blog post.
- Multimedia, including audio, video, screencasts, animation and
images, are available for incorporation into online articles and blog
posts.
- Social media tools are included, such as Technorati tags writers
can use to see what others have written on the same topic, social
bookmark accounts that make it easy to offer archives of relevant
pages, and RSS feeds that enable writers to subscribe to updates.
Check out IABC's announcement in traditional release format here, and in the social media format here.
Right off the bat, the two versions look vastly different, with the SMR format looking and reading more like an outline and - of course - including links to related news, video and audio (Press release + video/audio/links - transitions = SMR?). If I were a journalist, I think I'd prefer the SMR version, as all of the key facts, spokespeople quotes, etc., are easily identifiable in the outline format.
What are some thoughts from a PR perspective? Would it be hard to make the switch from writing traditional releases to writing in the SMR format? Would your clients be open to this kind of change?