Over the weekend, The
Consumerist blog
brought to light some recent changes to Facebook’s terms of service regarding the ownership of
content posted on the popular social networking site. Prior to this change, Facebook maintained a
“worldwide license” on the content that its user posted or uploaded to the site
while their account was open; once a user terminated their account, however, Facebook’s
license would expire. So all those zany candids
you shot with your iPhone at your raging dinner party over the weekend and then
happily plastered all over the Walls of the attendees, for example, according
to the old ToS, would disappear along with you if you decided to cancel your
account. Not so with the updated ToS,
though, which has subsequently set off a multitude of angry responses such as
the formation of groups protesting the change in terms and even a call for a
boycott of Facebook from entertainment blogger Perez Hilton.
The Consumerist’s post garnered approximately 300,000 page
views over the weekend, prompting CEO Mark Zuckerberg to respond to the flurry, assuring users that “we wouldn't share your information in a way
you wouldn't want.” (Yeah right!) Furthermore, their “philosophy that people own their
information and control who they share it with has remained constant. A lot of
the language in our terms is overly formal and protective of the rights we need
to provide this service to you.”
According to The
Industry Standard, a Facebook spokesperson also offered the following:
We are not claiming and have never claimed ownership of
material that users upload. The new Terms were clarified to be more
consistent with the behavior of the site. That is, if you send a message
to another user (or post to their wall, etc...), that content might not be
removed by Facebook if you delete your account (but can be deleted by your
friend). Furthermore, it is important to note that this license is made
subject to the user’s privacy settings. So any limitations that a user
puts on display of the relevant content (e.g. To specific friends) are
respected by Facebook. Also, the license only allows us to use the info
"in connection with the Facebook Service or the promotion thereof.
(emphasis mine)"
For me, that’s where it gets really sticky. Until this gets sorted out in a more
user-friendly fashion, I don’t think I can ignore the fine print. I won’t be posting anything too terribly
valuable, like the shots I snapped of the full moon over the Bay Bridge recently. And, should I decide to run for office one
day, hopefully my “25 Random Things”
note won’t come back to bite me in the backside.